3/24/2002 Dick Cheney Late Edition - CNN http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident/news-speeches/speeches/vp20020324-2.html WOLF BLITZER,
CNN ANCHOR: It's noon in Washington; 9:00 a.m. in Hollywood; 11:00 a.m. in San
Salvador; and 7:00 p.m. in Jerusalem. Wherever you're watching from around the
world, thanks for joining us for Late Edition. We'll get to
our special interview with the vice president, Dick Cheney, in just a few
minutes. But first, a news alert. (NEWSBREAK) BLITZER: As we
just saw live here on CNN, President Bush has arrived in El Salvador to meet
with President Francisco Flores. He'll be holding a joint news conference with
the El Salvador president in about two hours or so. We're looking at live
pictures now of the arrival ceremony in San Salvador. When that news conference
occurs, we will bring that to you live. Meanwhile,
while the president is turning some of his attention to the United States'
southern neighbors, the war against terrorism, as well as the
Israeli-Palestinian crisis, remain very much at the top of his agenda. Earlier today
I spoke with the vice president, Dick Cheney, about his recent trip to the
Middle East and much more. (BEGIN
VIDEOTAPE) BLITZER: Mr.
Vice President, thanks so much for joining us. DICK CHENEY,
VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: You're welcome. BLITZER: Are
you going back to the Middle East? That's the key question right now. CHENEY: Well,
I imagine I will at some point, but there's nothing currently scheduled. BLITZER: What
about this meeting that's going right now between General Zinni, the special
U.S. envoy, the Israelis and the Palestinians? Is it possible that as early as
today or tomorrow you could be going back? CHENEY: Well, remember what the
proposition here is, Wolf. General Zinni is there as our emissary. He's
presiding over what are called trilateral security meetings. This is an effort
to get the two sides to come together and agree upon a specific plan for the
implementation of the so-called Tenet work place, if you will. What we've
said is that if Arafat will get actively into that plan, actually implement and
begin to make progress, put out the kind of effort that we haven't seen up until
now, in terms of the provisions that are required in Tenet, then I'd be
prepared to meet with him. But to date, they have not gotten to that point yet. BLITZER: But
you're still waiting for a final word from General Zinni? CHENEY: Well,
I talked with General Zinni as recently as last night. General Powell and I
talk daily on the subject. This is just one more piece, if you will, of the
whole proposition. I wouldn't overdo it, in the sense that somehow everybody is
focused in on this is the be all and end all of the process; it's not. It's a
part of the process. If, in fact,
Arafat will do what he's, in the past, said he will do, if he'll actually
deliver on the Tenet plan, if he'll move to put a lid on the violence and do
what's required in Tenet -- for example, sharing of intelligence information,
taking responsibility for securing their own area so attacks can't be launched
against the Israelis and vice versa. If, in fact, those steps are actually
implemented, then at that point I'll be prepared to meet with Mr. Arafat. To
date, that hasn't happened, and therefore there's no meeting currently
scheduled. BLITZER: How
much of a pressure point is the fact that the Arab summit occurs in Beirut
later this week, Wednesday and Thursday, and Arafat certainly would like to go? CHENEY: Well,
he would like to go, but that's really independent of whether of not he meets
with me. That summit's
been scheduled for some time. There will be an issue, obviously, of whether or
not he is allowed out by the Israelis to attend the summit. BLITZER:
Should they let him go? CHENEY: Well,
the Israeli government's apparently split on it. Peres is quoted this morning
as saying he thinks he should be allowed to go. I think Prime Minister Sharon
has some reservations. It's our
general view that the summit has the potential to make a positive contribution
if they can focus on the proposal put forward by Crown Prince Abdullah from
Saudi Arabia that talks about basically land for peace, retreat to the '67
borders and normalization of relations of all the Arab nations with Israel. If
that's the focus, we think it will be a positive event. If Arafat's not there,
one of the concerns is that that will mean that the focus will be on the fact
that he's not there, and you won't get as much done that's productive as would
otherwise be the case. BLITZER: So
you would like him to go, basically? CHENEY: I
think the general view is that we'd be better off if he went than if he didn't
go. BLITZER:
There's some speculation in Israel, if Sharon lets him go, he might not let him
come back in to the West Bank or Gaza. Would that be an obstacle if that were
(OFF-MIKE) CHENEY: Well,
I -- let's, you know -- we aren't at that point yet where we have to address
that issue. I've seen the speculation. I can't obviously can't speak for the
Israeli government on that. BLITZER:
Getting back to your potential meeting with Arafat, as you know, the president
and you have refused to meet with him so far. Fifty-two senators signed a
letter the other day urging you not to meet with him, among other things.
Democrats and Republicans said, "Until Mr. Arafat and the Palestinian
Authority demonstrate their commitment to end the violence, we urge that the
vice president reconsider his offer to meet with Mr. Arafat." CHENEY: That's
exactly what we said. Obviously they didn't watch the press conference where we
announced this proposition. The potential of a meeting for me with Arafat is
something that was worked out in conjunction with both -- and signed up to both
by the Israelis and the Palestinians. CHENEY: And
was announced at a press conference in Jerusalem, where we laid out all those
conditions. I mean, I'm
glad to see so many members of Congress signing on for that, but the
proposition they put forward is basically the proposition we laid out: Unless
and until Arafat does in fact comply and moves to actually implement the Tenet
plan and all that that entails, in terms of moving to a cease-fire and actively
engaged in those issues, there won't be a meeting. And that's been true from
the very beginning. BLITZER: And
as of right now, there is not going to be a meeting? CHENEY: As of
right now, there's no meeting scheduled. BLITZER: All
right. Let's talk about the control that Arafat may or may not have over Palestinian
militants, presumably the Fatah movement al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade which has
recently claimed credit for several suicide bombing attacks against Israelis. Does Arafat
control the situation? CHENEY: No. I
think it's important to recall a little history here, Wolf, and that is at the
time of following the Oslo accords, there was an exchange of letters between
Arafat and then Prime Minister Rabin in Israel. And at that time, a specific
agreement was worked out in which Arafat renounced violence, agreed to enter
into peace negotiations, agreed to take the responsibility for the Palestinian
areas. And there was
arrangements made -- arrangements were made for Palestinian Authority security
force, 30,000 strong. It was specified how many men, what kind of weapons they
would have. But their responsibilities were to provide security in those areas
that the Israelis were not actually occupying with respect to the West Bank and
Gaza. Clearly we've
come a long way from that because that hasn't happened. In effect, that
accord's never been effectively implemented, certainly not at this stage. We come back
again to the basic proposition: We've got to find some way to end the violence.
We've got to find some way to get back on the process of negotiations. The proposal
that everybody signed up to on both sides was the so-called Tenet plan last
summer, and what we're trying to do now is implement Tenet plan. And if and
when Arafat does not just agree to that, but actually begins to implement it
and move toward a cease-fire along with the Israelis -- both sides have
obligations and responsibilities under that -- then I'm prepared to meet with
Arafat, but not until. BLITZER:
Because, specifically, I want to play for you what the president said on
Thursday in El Paso, Texas, on the whole issue of terrorism. Just listen to
this. He has said this before but specifically referring to what's happening in
the West Bank and Gaza. (BEGIN VIDEO
CLIP) GEORGE W.
BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: If you harbor a terrorist, if you hide a
terrorist, if you feed terrorist, you're just as guilty as the terrorist
himself. (END VIDEO
CLIP) BLITZER: Now,
the Israelis and many of their supporters say that's presumably -- that's
precisely what Arafat is doing. He's harboring terrorists within his own
al-Aqsa Brigade. CHENEY: We
made it very, very clear that we expect out of Arafat a 100 percent effort to
put an end to terrorist attacks -- suicide bombings, attacks that are
sanctioned or authorized or organized by any of those groups. Clearly, he
has more control over some of those groups than he does others. And there's
always the possibility that there will be some independent actor launching a
suicide or a terrorist attack. And there are organizations, such as Hezbollah
for example, which are absolutely devoted to the proposition of trying to
destroy the peace process. But until
we've seen real live, honest-to-goodness, on-the-ground performance, there
won't be any meetings. BLITZER: And
you haven't seen that. CHENEY: We
haven't seen it yet. BLITZER: Some
of the criticism, Bill Bennett, a Republican, conservative wrote in The
Washington Post this week, speaking about the pressure recently put on the
Sharon government in Israel. He wrote, "The administration's policy in the
Middle East just took a dramatic turn in the wrong direction. This turn at once
marks a concession to terrorism and a violation of principle." Those are
strong words coming from a fellow conservative, who doesn't like the fact that
you called Sharon's policies "not helpful." CHENEY: Well,
I just disagree with Bill. I think he's wrong. I think, again, that we've got
to do the best job we can of trying to facilitate some kind of an agreement
between the Israelis and the Palestinians and getting back to Tenet and
Mitchell. It ain't easy. It's one of the toughest, most difficult, impractical
problems I've ever seen. But we've got
a very good man out there in General Zinni, who has taken on the assignment,
very difficult assignment, of trying to broker actual implementation of the
Tenet accords so we can get on to Mitchell. He needs to be supported. We're doing
everything we can to support him. The president's actively engaged. Secretary
Powell's actively engaged in talking with both sides. And we need to do everything
we can to get on with it, because of course, the loss of life is tragic, and
the prospects for peace recede every day that we're not able to actually engage
on the Tenet and Mitchell plans. BLITZER:
There's a front-page story in the New York Times today quoting Israeli and U.S.
intelligence sources as saying there's a very strong connection between Iran
and the Palestinian Authority -- not just the Karine A, the ship with about 50
tons of weapons that were seized by the Israelis, but a lot of other support,
money, cooperation going back and forth. How serious of
a problem is that? Is it true, first of all? CHENEY: Well,
first of all, I wouldn't comment one way or the other about an intelligence
story or stories based on alleged intelligence sources. That's a -- it would be
inappropriate for me to do that. We do know,
based on the incident, the Karine A, earlier, several months ago, that in fact
there were arms, acquired in Iran, being shipped through Hezbollah to elements
of the Palestinian Authority. That was clear. And we spoke out about it at the
time. We made it abundantly clear to Arafat and everybody else involved that
that was unacceptable. Now whether or
not there's a deeper level of involvement there, I don't know. We'll have to
see. Obviously, it would be of great concern. The Karine A
was of great concern, because it demonstrated that Arafat, at a time when he
supposedly is interested in engaging and getting something going on the peace
process, was acquiescing at least in the shipment of arms and doing business
with the Iranians. But we need to
get on with the Tenet and Mitchell processes aggressively as we know how. BLITZER: And is that in part because, without that, you're not
going to be able to generate the support for action against Iraq, if it comes
down to that? On your most
recent trip to the region, most of these moderate Arab leaders with whom you
met were not very enthusiastic about a U.S. strike against Iraq. King Abdullah
of Jordan said, "To attack Baghdad now would be a disaster." Crown
Prince Abdullah said, "I do not believe it is in the United States'
interest or the interest of the region or the world's interest to do so." Those are
pretty strong recommendations for you to hold back on Iraq. CHENEY: But I -- the world's a lot more
complicated than that, Wolf. And there's a great temptation to say, you know,
"If A, then B." We try to connect these things up in our mind. There's no
question but that there's a high level of concern throughout the region about
the situation and the ongoing conflict between the Israelis and the
Palestinians. It's not surprising King Abdullah of Jordan should be concerned;
he lives right next door. He's got 60 percent of his population is Palestinian.
His father's regime was almost overthrown by the PLO back in 1970, and there's
a long history there. On the other
side, he's bracketed by Iraq and Saddam Hussein. What I would say is that our friends in the region are
equally concerned about the problems we see in Iraq, specifically the development
of weapons of mass destruction by Saddam Hussein, his refusal to comply with the U.N. Security Council
Resolution 687, which he signed up to at the end of the Gulf War, which said he
would get rid of all his weapons of mass destruction. BLITZER: Are
you still committed to trying to get U.N. weapons inspection teams back into
Iraq? Because, as you know, some critics -- Senator Fred Thompson, for example
-- said that would be a waste, that they're just going to give a runaround. CHENEY: What
we said, Wolf, if you go back and look at the record is, the issue's not
inspectors. The issue is that he has chemical weapons and he's used them. The
issue is that he's developing and has biological weapons. The issue is that
he's pursuing nuclear weapons. It's the weapons
of mass destruction and what he's already done with them. There's a devastating
story in this week's New Yorker magazine on his use of chemical weapons against
the Kurds of northern Iraq back in 1988; may have hit as many 200 separate
towns and villages. Killed upwards of 100,000 people, according to the article
if it's to be believed. This is a
man of great evil, as the president said. And he is actively pursuing nuclear
weapons at this time, and we think that's cause for concern for us and for everybody
in the region. And I found during the course of my travels that it is indeed a
problem of great concern
for our friends out there as well too. So the U.S.
doesn't have a choice of saying, well, we're going to worry about
Israeli-Palestinian peace or we're going to worry about Saddam Hussein. We've
got to do it all. BLITZER: How
much time does Saddam Hussein have? CHENEY: I
can't say, I can't make a prediction on something like that. He knows we're
deadly serious. Our friends and allies in the region know we're deadly serious
and that we do need to find a way to address this problem. BLITZER: Is Al
Qaeda regrouping, the Taliban-Al Qaeda fighters in Afghanistan right now, are
they regrouping? CHENEY:
Regrouping. BLITZER:
Poised to take action against the U.S. and other... CHENEY: Well,
they clearly would like to. And we see movement. We saw, obviously, a
coalescing of a group in the area where we launched Operation Anaconda a couple
of weeks ago, and very successfully eliminated a big chunk of the Al Qaeda. CHENEY: There
are still Al Qaeda scattered around Afghanistan. There are, I'm sure, going to
be efforts by them to try to organize themselves enough so that they can launch
an attack at least on our forces in Afghanistan. We see intelligence to that
effect. This effort's
going last for some considerable period of time. There's a temptation, I think,
because there's not an active bombing campaign under way on any particular day,
for people who want to run out and say, well, it's over with. It's not. This is
a long-term commitment. We have to make certain we get a good government stood
up in Afghanistan, that it can never again become a sanctuary for a terrorist
organization like Al Qaeda. BLITZER: Is it
your best assessment right now that the anthrax attacks late last year in the
United States were the work of domestic American terrorists, or perhaps Al
Qaeda foreign terrorists? CHENEY: We
don't know. Clearly, there's a robust investigation under way by the FBI, but
at this point I don't think we know enough to draw a conclusion. We're running
down every lead. You can find evidence to support a variety of points of view.
But at this point I'd say that, at least as far as I'm concerned and what I've
seen, and I get briefed on a regular basis, I don't think we can decide or
determine yet exactly where it came from. BLITZER: And
your best assessment where Osama bin Laden is right now? CHENEY: I
think he's still in the area of Afghanistan, maybe across the border in
Pakistan someplace, but I think he's still out in the general area. BLITZER: Still
alive. CHENEY: If
he's not dead. But we don't know. But obviously, we'd like to wrap him up; I
expect we probably will. But we've had enormous success at taking down the
Taliban, wrapping up the Al Qaeda organization. I think the Afghan campaign's
been a great success story for U.S. military forces and for the president's
leadership. BLITZER: I'm
going to let you go now. But before I let you go, how are you feeling? CHENEY: Good.
You should have been with me on that trip, Wolf. We missed you. BLITZER: You
didn't invite me. CHENEY: Next
time. BLITZER: All
right. Thanks for joining us. CHENEY: Good
to see you. |